Previous Page  22 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Features

22

MONDAY, APRIL 20, 2020

Paul Wiseman

WASHINGTON (AP) - The sick who

still go to work because they have

no paid leave.

Families who face ruin from

even a temporary layoff.

Frontline workers risking infect-

ion as they drive buses, bag takeout

meals and mop hospital €loors.

For years, €inancial inequality

has widened in the United States

(US) and elsewhere as wealth and

income have become increasingly

concentrated among the most

af€luent while millions struggle

to get by. Now, the coronavirus

outbreak has laid bare the human

cost of that inequality, making it

more visible and potentially worse.

Congress, the Trump adminis-

tration and the Federal Reserve

have mounted the largest €inancial

intervention in history - a full-scale

drive that includes mandating

sick leave for some, distributing

USD1,200 cheques to individuals,

allocating rescue aid to employers

and expanding unemployment be-

ne€its to try to help America survive

the crisis. Yet those measures are

only temporary. And for millions of

newly unemployed, they may not

be enough.

The disaster that is igniting

what's likely to be a deep recession

also raises the question of what

happens once life begins to edge

back to normal.

Will the US remain an outlier

among wealthy countries in

providing limited protections for

the financially vulnerable? Or will

it expand the social safety net, as

it did after the Great Depression

of the 1930s but largely did not

after the Great Recession that

ended in 2009?

"Maybe there will be a cultural

shift,'' said Senior Economist at

the Economic Policy Institute Elise

Gould. "I see it as a great opening

to try to (provide) those labour

protections that low-wage workers

didn't have before.''

Gould

notes

that

the

government's suddenly expanded

role now in distributing relief

checks, expanding health bene€its

and sick leave and supplementing

state unemployment aid would

make it easier to extend such

programmes even after a recession

has ended. Doing so could have

the longer-term effect of reducing

€inancial inequalities.

Whether the government ends

up adopting any long-lasting policy

reforms will depend in part on which

party controls the White House and

Congress beginning in January. In

the meantime, the topic is sure to

drivemuch of the campaign rhetoric

as the presidential race moves

toward the November election.

Alone

among

advanced

economies, the US doesn't require

employers to grant sick leave and

paid time off. America's system

for providing unemployment aid,

a patchwork of state programmes,

isn't as generous or ef€icient as

Europeangovernment programmes

that subsidise wages or provide

safeguards to limit layoffs.

America's minimum wages also

lag far behind those in most of

Europe, though many states have

raised their minimums in recent

years. In 2018, the Organization

for Economic Cooperation and

Development (OECD) concluded

that the US national minimum wage

paid 33 cents for every USD1 earned

by workers in the middle of the

earnings spectrum. That contrasted

with 46 cents in Germany, 54 cents

in the United Kingdom (UK) and 62

cents in France.

The coronavirus has struck

at the most vulnerable. African-

Americans account for 42 per cent

of thenearly3,300COVIDŸ19deaths

that The Associated Press reviewed

- twice their share of the population

in the areas covered by the analysis.

Blacks as a group earn less, endure

higher rates of unemployment and

have less access to health care

than other Americans. They also

suffer disproportionately from the

underlying conditions that make

them more vulnerable to COVIDŸ19:

Diabetes, obesity, asthma.

The €inancial pain, too, has

landed hardest on the neediest as

the economy locks down to €ight

the outbreak. The United States

last month lost 713,000 private

sector jobs. Jobs in leisure and

hospitality (mostly restaurants and

hotels) accounted for 64 per cent

of the losses. And those workers

earn an average of just USD16.83

an hour, 41 per cent less than the

average American.

They are people like Alexi

Ajoste, who worked at a Panera

Bread shop for three years

before being furloughed late

last month. Ajoste, a 20-year-old

from Tempe, Arizona, has €iled for

unemployment bene€its.

"I have a savings account

and have money backed up for

emergencies, but it scares me,"

Ajoste said. "I don't know if my

savings account is enough for all of

this. I feel like the unemployment

checks will be enough for the next

couple of months... As long as it

doesn't last four or €ive months, I

think I'll be good."

Congress' rescue plans are

intended to ease the pain. They

require companies with fewer than

500workers to offer paid sick leave,

although employers with fewer than

50 can seek an exemption. The

government is sending USD1,200

cheques to Americans who earn up

to USD75,000 and smaller cheques

to many who earn more.

The rescue plan extended

unemployment bene€its for the €irst

time to part-time and gig workers

such as Uber drivers. And it added

USD600 a week to existing state

unemployment payments. But

states have been swamped by

claims for jobless bene€its - nearly

17 million over the past three weeks

- and are struggling to deliver the

new federal aid.

Shamira Chism, for example,

who was laid off from her job as a

A matter of inequality

A closed sign in front of the Hogle Zoo, due to the coronavirus outbreak, in Salt Lake City. PHOTOS: AP

The pandemic has exposed the great divide between the rich and the

poor in the United States. But will it spur lasting remedies?

line cook at a Nashville restaurant

three weeks ago, says she's getting

by on state unemployment bene€its

of USD275 a week. But she's still

waiting for Tennessee to upgrade

its systems to deliver the additional

USD600 a week in federally

provided bene€its.

Throughout

US

history,

economic

catastrophes

have

sometimes

led

to

lasting

programmes to bene€it ordinary

people - and sometimes have not.

Former US President Franklin D

Roosevelt drove through a series

of lasting changes to the economy

after the Depression struck, to

provide Social Security pensions,

for instance, and to make it easier

for workers to form unions and

bargain for higher wages and better

working conditions.

Former US President Barack

Obama countered the Great

Recession with a stimulus package

and pushed through legislation

that provided health insurance

coverage to millions of Americans.

But a backlash by conservative

critics, decrying what they

called meddlesome and costly

government programmes, stymied

further action. The government

ended up doing less to help

the economy recover from the

Great Recession than it had after

previous downturns.

This time, said Alexandra

Cawthorne Gaines of the liberal

Center for American Progress,

“What we want to see are long-

term structural changes”, including

expanding access to health care.

In light of the crisis, she said, there

may be more willingness, from

Republicans and Democrats alike,

to better protect the neediest.

Gould at the Economic Policy

Institute said the country needs to

strengthen its social safety so the

needy aren't left so vulnerable in

the next public health crisis.

"This is not the last time this is

going to happen," she said.

Small businesses are shuttered closed during the coronavirus epidemic in

the Crown Heights neighbourhood of the Brooklyn borough in New York

The seating area of a food court at Assi Plaza is closed-off in Niles, Illinois